Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The ante-in antecedent means 'before; in front of'. Thus, when a pro-form precedes its antecedent, the antecedent is not literally an antecedent, but rather it is a postcedent, post-meaning 'after; behind'. The following examples, wherein the pro-forms are bolded and their postcedents are underlined, illustrate this distinction: a.
Agreement between pronoun (or corresponding possessive adjective) and antecedent also requires the selection of the correct person. For example, if the antecedent is the first person noun phrase Mary and I , then a first person pronoun ( we/us/our ) is required; however, most noun phrases ( the dog , my cats , Jack and Jill , etc.) are third ...
An aspect of VP ellipsis that has been the subject of much theoretical analysis occurs when elided VP appears to be contained inside its antecedent. The phenomenon is called antecedent-contained ellipsis or antecedent-contained deletion (ACD). This is displayed in both examples below where the antecedent is represented by bolded font.
The examples in (10) show that PRO is grammatical as the subject of non-finite clauses. In both (10a) and (10b), PRO is the subject of the non-finite clause to study physics. In (10a), the antecedent of PRO is the matrix subject Kerry, and in (10b) it is the matrix object Sarah. The examples in (11) show that PRO is ungrammatical in finite ...
A list of phenomena in syntax.. Anaphora; Agreement; Answer ellipsis; Antecedent-contained deletion; Binding; Case; Clitics; Control; Coreference; Differential Object ...
In English grammar, a pronoun has a possessive antecedent if its antecedent (the noun that it refers to) appears in the possessive case; for example, in the following sentence, Winston Churchill is a possessive antecedent, serving as it does as the antecedent for the pronoun him: Winston Churchill's history shows him to have been a good writer.
past participle clauses having an unvoiced zero object argument that takes an antecedent to the argument: The body found ∅ here yesterday has now been identified. (This is the "reduced object passive relative clause"; see Reduced relative clause § Non-finite types. For further examples see Uses of English verb forms § Uses of nonfinite verbs.
The following two examples show how the argument structure of the verb "consider" affects what predicate can be in the small clause. [38] I consider [ Mr. Nyman a genius]. *I consider [ Mr. Nyman in my shed]. Example (18) is ungrammatical as the verb "consider" does take an NP complement, but not a PP complement. [38]