When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: 52 2 court case lookup

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Students_for_Fair...

    In 2019 a district court judge upheld Harvard's limited use of race as a factor in admissions, stating lack of evidence for 'discriminatory animus' or 'conscious prejudice'. [8] In 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling. [9] In 2021, SFFA petitioned the Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the ...

  3. Brown v. Board of Education - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education

    Kentucky (1908) Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), [1] was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality. The decision partially overruled the Court's 1896 ...

  4. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_Parenthood_of...

    Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (1976), is a United States Supreme Court case on abortion. [1] The plaintiffs challenged the constitutionality of a Missouri statute regulating abortion. The Court upheld the right to have an abortion, declaring unconstitutional ...

  5. Personal and business legal affairs of Donald Trump - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_and_business...

    t. e. From the 1970s until he was elected president in 2016, Donald Trump and his businesses were involved in over 4,000 legal cases in United States federal and state courts, including battles with casino patrons, million-dollar real estate lawsuits, personal defamation lawsuits, and over 100 business tax disputes. [1]

  6. District Attorney's Office v. Osborne - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_Attorney's_Office...

    District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne, 557 U.S. 52 (2009), [1] was a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that the Constitution 's due process clause does not require states to turn over DNA evidence to a party seeking a civil suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. [2]

  7. Crawford v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crawford_v._Washington

    Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that reformulated the standard for determining when the admission of hearsay statements in criminal cases is permitted under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. The Court held that prior testimonial statements of witnesses who have since ...