Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Job interview candidates who describe a “Target” they set themselves instead of an externally imposed “Task” emphasize their own intrinsic motivation to perform and to develop their performance. Action: What did you do? The interviewer will be looking for information on what you did, why you did it and what the alternatives were.
The secretary problem demonstrates a scenario involving optimal stopping theory [1] [2] that is studied extensively in the fields of applied probability, statistics, and decision theory. It is also known as the marriage problem , the sultan's dowry problem , the fussy suitor problem , the googol game , and the best choice problem .
In a learning problem, the goal is to develop a function () that predicts output values for each input datum . The subscript n {\displaystyle n} indicates that the function f n {\displaystyle f_{n}} is developed based on a data set of n {\displaystyle n} data points.
Structured prediction: When the desired output value is a complex object, such as a parse tree or a labeled graph, then standard methods must be extended. Learning to rank: When the input is a set of objects and the desired output is a ranking of those objects, then again the standard methods must be extended.
An example application is the problem of translating a natural language sentence into a syntactic representation such as a parse tree. This can be seen as a structured prediction problem [ 2 ] in which the structured output domain is the set of all possible parse trees.
Use of futures may be implicit (any use of the future automatically obtains its value, as if it were an ordinary reference) or explicit (the user must call a function to obtain the value, such as the get method of java.util.concurrent.Futurein Java). Obtaining the value of an explicit future can be called stinging or forcing. Explicit futures ...
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
PPLs often extend from a basic language. For instance, Turing.jl [12] is based on Julia, Infer.NET is based on .NET Framework, [13] while PRISM extends from Prolog. [14] However, some PPLs, such as WinBUGS, offer a self-contained language that maps closely to the mathematical representation of the statistical models, with no obvious origin in another programming language.