Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents a prosecutor from using evidence that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies to states as well as the federal government.
Dollree Mapp (October 30, 1923 – October 31, 2014) was the appellant in the Supreme Court case Mapp v. Ohio (1961). She argued that her right to privacy in her home, the Fourth Amendment, was violated by police officers who entered her house with what she thought to be a fake search warrant. [1]
367 U.S. 497 (1961) ripeness to challenge statute banning contraceptives: Mapp v. Ohio: Criminal procedure: 367 U.S. 643 (1961) search and seizure, exclusionary rule Marcus v. Search Warrant: 367 U.S. 717 (1961) Procedural burden on state in seizure of obscene material Hamilton v. Alabama: 368 U.S. 52 (1961)
1961 Mapp v. Ohio, 377 U.S. 643 (1961) - Amicus curiae for Dollree Mapp; Poe v. Ullman; 1962 Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962) - represented Steven I. Engel; 1963 Abington School District v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963) - represented Edward Schempp; Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963) - Amicus curiae for Clarence Earl Gideon; 1964 ...
(Overruled by Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson (1952)) Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919) Expressions in which the circumstances are intended to result in crime that poses a clear and present danger of succeeding can be punished without violating the First Amendment. (Overruled by Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)) Abrams v.
The 1961 Buckeyes football season, led by Coach Woody Hayes, opened with a 7-7 tie against Texas Christian University. But Ohio State went on to win nine consecutive games, including a 50-20 ...
Amid a backdrop where the city is facing a mounting budget crisis that could lead to its first shutdown in history if a new spending plan is not approved by the end of the year, Johnson recently ...
Mapp v. Ohio in 1961 and Miranda v. Arizona in 1966 were two highly influential court decisions. [7] Mapp v. Ohio found that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment protection against "unreasonable searches and seizures" may not be used in criminal prosecutions. Miranda v.