Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
These processes interact via the constraint store: a process can add a constraint to the constraint store while another one checks whether a constraint is entailed by the store. Adding a constraint to the store is done like in regular constraint logic programming. Checking entailment of a constraint is done via guards to clauses. Guards require ...
where each of ,,, is a conjunction of constraints: , and contain CHR constraints, while the guards are built-in. Only one of , needs to be non-empty. The host language must also define built-in constraints over terms. The guards in rules are built-in constraints, so they effectively execute host language code.
Constraint logic programming is a form of constraint programming, in which logic programming is extended to include concepts from constraint satisfaction. A constraint logic program is a logic program that contains constraints in the body of clauses. An example of a clause including a constraint is A (X, Y):-X + Y > 0, B (X), C (Y).
The bucket elimination algorithm can be adapted for constraint optimization. A given variable can be indeed removed from the problem by replacing all soft constraints containing it with a new soft constraint. The cost of this new constraint is computed assuming a maximal value for every value of the removed variable.
Constraint programming (CP) [1] is a paradigm for solving combinatorial problems that draws on a wide range of techniques from artificial intelligence, computer science, and operations research. In constraint programming, users declaratively state the constraints on the feasible solutions for a
In mathematics, a constraint is a condition of an optimization problem that the solution must satisfy. There are several types of constraints—primarily equality constraints, inequality constraints, and integer constraints. The set of candidate solutions that satisfy all constraints is called the feasible set. [1]
In constrained least squares one solves a linear least squares problem with an additional constraint on the solution. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] This means, the unconstrained equation X β = y {\displaystyle \mathbf {X} {\boldsymbol {\beta }}=\mathbf {y} } must be fit as closely as possible (in the least squares sense) while ensuring that some other property ...
However, it may also add new constraints to the instance. As a result, even if the width of the original problem is , the width of the resulting instance may be greater. If this is the case, directional strong consistency does not imply satisfiability even if no domain is empty and no constraint is unsatisfiable.