Ad
related to: campbell v. acuff-rose music case brief historycourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
- Public Court Records
See Public Public Court Records
Millions Of Citizens. Search Today!
- Court Case Records
Get Info On Any Public Court Case
Reveal Incriminating Details Today!
- Criminal Court Records
See If Anyone Has Been To Court
Browse Up To Date Court Records
- County Court Records
Easily Search Court Records Online
Just Enter A Name & Choose A State
- Court Criminal Check
Court Records, Millions Of Citizens
Available In Our Database. Search
- State Court Record Search
Search Our Database For Court Info
Answer Your Burning Questions Now!
- Public Court Records
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), was a United States Supreme Court copyright law case that established that a commercial parody can qualify as fair use. [1] This case established that the fact that money is made by a work does not make it impossible for fair use to apply; it is merely one of the components of a fair use analysis.
On March 7, 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court decided for the first time that a parody may be a copyright fair use. In the 25 years that followed, the High Court’s unanimous 9-0 ruling in Campbell v ...
Acuff-Rose Music was involved in a landmark copyright infringement case in the 1990s: Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. (510 U.S. 569; 1994). In dispute was the use by rap artist Luther Campbell (then using the alias "Luke Skyywalker") and his band 2 Live Crew of a substantial amount of the Roy Orbison hit song " Oh, Pretty Woman " in a parody .
In Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music Inc [13] the U.S. Supreme Court recognized parody as a potential fair use, even when done for profit. Roy Orbison's, Acuff-Rose Music, had sued 2 Live Crew in 1989 for their use of Orbison's "Oh, Pretty Woman" in a mocking rap version with altered lyrics. The Supreme Court viewed 2 Live Crew's version as a ...
Leval's article is cited in the Supreme Court's 1994 decision in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., which marked a shift in judicial treatment of fair use toward a transformativeness analysis and away from emphasizing the "commerciality" analysis of the fourth factor. Prior to Leval's article, the fourth factor had often been described as the ...
Transformativeness is a crucial factor in current legal analysis of derivative works largely as a result of the Supreme Court's 1994 decision in Campbell v.Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.
The case has drawn interest from music industry trade groups including the Recording Industry Association of America and National Music Publishers' Association, which also encouraged the court to ...
The case went to the U.S. Supreme Court, where Russell and the members of 2 Live Crew argued that song parodies were protected under fair use. The Supreme Court agreed and ruled in favor of Russell and 2 Live Crew (Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.). [citation needed]