When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lujan_v._Defenders_of_Wildlife

    Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992), was a landmark Supreme Court of the United States decision, handed down on June 12, 1992, that heightened standing requirements under Article III of the United States Constitution. It is "one of the most influential cases in modern environmental standing jurisprudence."

  3. Tyrer v. the United Kingdom - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrer_v._the_United_Kingdom

    By a majority of six votes to one, the court held Tyrer's birching to constitute degrading treatment contrary to the Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [2] Significant conclusions of the case included that "the Convention is a living instrument which, as the Commission rightly stressed, must be interpreted in the light of ...

  4. Family court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_court

    The Family Court was created by Part 2 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013, merging the family law functions of the county courts and magistrates' courts into one. Two scenarios are covered by the Children Act of 1989: private law cases, where the applicant and respondent are usually the child's parents ; and public law cases, where the applicant ...

  5. National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Institute_of...

    National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, 585 U.S. 755 (2018), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States addressing the constitutionality of California's FACT Act, which mandated that crisis pregnancy centers provide certain disclosures about state services.

  6. Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feist_Publications,_Inc...

    The Second Circuit thereby rejected a Minnesota district court's 1996 determination (Oasis Publishing Co. v. West Publishing Co., 924 F.Supp. 918, D. Minn.) that Feist does not change the outcome of West. In the same case, but in separate decisions in which Matthew Bender was not involved, HyperLaw successfully challenged West's text claims.

  7. Filártiga v. Peña-Irala - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filártiga_v._Peña-Irala

    Filártiga v. Peña-Irala, 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1980), was a landmark case in United States and international law.It set the precedent for United States federal courts to punish non-American citizens for tortious acts committed outside the United States that were in violation of public international law (the law of nations) or any treaties to which the United States is a party.

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Article Three of the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of_the...

    This transformed the article IV United States territorial court in Puerto Rico, created in 1900, to an Article III federal judicial district court. The Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937 , frequently called the court-packing plan , [ 6 ] was a legislative initiative to add more justices to the Supreme Court proposed by President Franklin D ...