Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
An attempt to end the Ohio estate tax was blocked in 2001 when state revenues began to drop and intense lobbying from a league of suburban municipalities lobbied for a continuation of the tax. In 2007, the Ohio estate tax was again proposed for amendment or repeal. A repealing the estate tax of Ohio was enacted by its general assembly during ...
In central Ohio, the commission is often 3% of the sales price to each. A seller, for example, would pay a total of $18,000 ($9,000 to agents on each side) on the sale of a $300,000 home.
The rule against perpetuities serves a number of purposes. First, English courts have long recognized that allowing owners to attach long-lasting contingencies to their property harms the ability of future generations to freely buy and sell the property, since few people would be willing to buy property that had unresolved issues regarding its ownership hanging over it.
Under this example, a homeowner with income of $50,000 whose property tax was $3,000 would get the full $1,500 credit and end up paying a net $1,500 in property tax.
The Ohio Department of Taxation is the administrative department of the Ohio state government [1] responsible for collection and administration of most state taxes, several local taxes and the oversight of real property taxation.
Subrogation is the assumption by a third party (such as a second creditor or an insurance company) of another party's legal right to collect debts or damages. [1] It is a legal doctrine whereby one person is entitled to enforce the subsisting or revived rights of another for their own benefit. [ 2 ]
The Ohio Revised Code (ORC) contains all current statutes of the Ohio General Assembly of a permanent and general nature, consolidated into provisions, titles, chapters and sections. [1] However, the only official publication of the enactments of the General Assembly is the Laws of Ohio ; the Ohio Revised Code is only a reference.
Case history; Prior: Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Zauderer, 10 Ohio St. 3d 44, 461 N.E.2d 883 (1984); probable jurisdiction noted, 469 U.S. 813 (1984).: Holding; A State may require advertisers to include "purely factual and uncontroversial" disclosures without violating the First Amendment rights of the advertiser as long as the disclosure is in the State's interest in preventing ...