When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: equivalent fractions property

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Equivalence relation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_relation

    indicates that the column's property is always true for the row's term (at the very left), while indicates that the property is not guaranteed in general (it might, or might not, hold). For example, that every equivalence relation is symmetric, but not necessarily antisymmetric, is indicated by Y in the "Symmetric" column and in the ...

  3. Universal property - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_property

    In particular, the concept of universal property allows a simple proof that all constructions of real numbers are equivalent: it suffices to prove that they satisfy the same universal property. Technically, a universal property is defined in terms of categories and functors by means of a universal morphism (see § Formal definition, below).

  4. Equivalence class - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_class

    The same construction can be generalized to the field of fractions of any integral domain. If X {\displaystyle X} consists of all the lines in, say, the Euclidean plane , and L ∼ M {\displaystyle L\sim M} means that L {\displaystyle L} and M {\displaystyle M} are parallel lines , then the set of lines that are parallel to each other form an ...

  5. Irreducible fraction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreducible_fraction

    Two fractions ⁠ a / b ⁠ and ⁠ c / d ⁠ are equal or equivalent if and only if ad = bc.) For example, ⁠ 1 / 4 ⁠ , ⁠ 5 / 6 ⁠ , and ⁠ −101 / 100 ⁠ are all irreducible fractions. On the other hand, ⁠ 2 / 4 ⁠ is reducible since it is equal in value to ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠ , and the numerator of ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠ is less than the ...

  6. Fraction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraction

    The process for subtracting fractions is, in essence, the same as that of adding them: find a common denominator, and change each fraction to an equivalent fraction with the chosen common denominator. The resulting fraction will have that denominator, and its numerator will be the result of subtracting the numerators of the original fractions.

  7. List of logarithmic identities - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_logarithmic_identities

    A fundamental feature of the proof is the accumulation of the subtrahends into a unit fraction, that is, = for , thus = + rather than = | |, where the extrema of are [,] if = and [,] otherwise, with the minimum of being implicit in the latter case due to the structural requirements of the proof.