Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Exclusive federal powers are powers within a federal system of government that each constituent political unit (such as a state or province) is absolutely or conditionally prohibited from exercising. [1] That is, either a constituent political unit may never exercise these powers, or may only do so with the consent of the federal government.
The relationship between the federal and provincial powers is generally referred to as the "division of powers", meaning federalism issues, not separation of powers. Both the federal powers and the provincial powers are stated to be exclusive, not concurrent.
During the heyday of the civil rights movement, defenders of racial segregation [48] [c] used the term "states' rights" as a code word in what is now referred to as dog-whistle politics: political messaging that appears to mean one thing to the general population but has an additional, different, or more specific resonance for a targeted subgroup.
The scope of comparative constitutional law is broad, encompassing the study of written and unwritten constitutions and unitary, federal, and confederal systems. It addresses fundamental issues such as the separation of powers, protection of human rights, political representation, and the resolution of constitutional conflicts. [3]
The enumerated powers (also called expressed powers, explicit powers or delegated powers) of the United States Congress are the powers granted to the federal government of the United States by the United States Constitution. Most of these powers are listed in Article I, Section 8.
The Tenth Amendment (Amendment X) to the United States Constitution, a part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791. [1] It expresses the principle of federalism, whereby the federal government and the individual states share power, by mutual agreement, with the federal government having the supremacy.
Territorial jurisdiction in United States law refers to a court's power over events and persons within the bounds of a particular geographic territory. If a court does not have territorial jurisdiction over the events or persons within it, then the court cannot bind the defendant to an obligation or adjudicate any rights involving them.
Argument: Oral argument: Case history; Prior: See Zivotofsky v.Clinton for details.: Holding; The President has the exclusive power to grant formal recognition to a foreign sovereign. . Because the power to recognize foreign states resides in the President alone, § 214(d) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act infringes on the Executive’s decision to withhold recognition with respect to ...