Ad
related to: trademark non use cancellation agreement format in excel
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A non-assertion covenant (nonassert for short) is an agreement by a party not to seek to enforce patent or other intellectual property rights it may have against another party or parties. Nonasserts are often used as patent-infringement settlement agreements that are designed and drafted with the purpose of preemptively resolving future ...
The following partial list contains marks which were originally legally protected trademarks, but which have subsequently lost legal protection as trademarks due to abandonment, non-renewal or improper issuance (the generic term predated the registration). Some marks retain trademark protection in certain countries despite being generic in others.
A cause of action for passing off is a form of intellectual property enforcement against the unauthorised use of the trade dress (the whole external appearance or look-and-feel of a product, including any marks or other indicia used) which is considered to be similar to that of another party's product, including any registered or unregistered trademarks.
In order to successfully assert a fair-use defense to a trademark infringement claim, the defendant must prove the three elements of the fair-use doctrine: (1) that the term was used in a way other than as a mark; (2) that the term was used to describe the goods or services offered or their geographic origin; and (3) that the use had been ...
A trademark coexistence agreement is a contract made by two parties to use a similar trademark for marketing purposes without interfering in each other's enterprises. . Agreements of this nature are often made as parties only require regional use of their trademarks, and therefore other enterprises use of a trademark will not harm their
Nominative fair use of a mark may also occur within the context of comparative advertising. [2] Under U.S. Supreme Court precedent, the fair use defense in trademark law is not precluded by the possibility of confusion. [3] However, courts may consider the possibility of confusion in analyzing whether a use is fair or not. [4]
In the U.S., if a trademark has been used for a continuous period of at least five years after the date of registration, the right to use the mark and the registration may become "incontestable" (e.g. invulnerable to cancellation for non-use, but not for becoming generic).
In Indian trademark law, the first user of an unregistered trademark has priority over a later user who registers the trademark if it can be proven that first use predated trademark registration. [7] Registering a trademark gives the owner the exclusive right to use it, unless another entity's prior use can be established.