Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Some are highly reputable, others less so. So it's generally a reputable publisher but there can still be individual journals that don't do proper peer review. I see the article is open access, which means that the author paid the US$1,950 / £1,500 / €1,725 (or a discounted version) fee.
this is the window i get: I just opened a tandfonline paper via Sci hub. So it's not a problem with the publisher itself I guess. Auto-reply: Get fast answers at the /r/SciHub wiki for common questions, a list of mirrors, and VPN tips. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically.
The basic rule that I've been taught is if it's a journal you would reasonably expect to want to publish in in the future, do the review. If not, don't do the review. For me, this is helpful because it eliminates the need to figure out what is predatory and just cuts out a whole bunch of bottom-tier journals.
1.) openaccessbutton.org works great for me. It’s hit and miss but it’s a good first step. 2.) When you find one on google scholar, instead of clicking the main title click the button that says “x versions” and look for any of them that say [PDF] 2. Reply. Share. reemani600. • 5 yr. ago.
Hello, everyone! I'm a masters scholar and our university doesn't have a lot of resources when it comes to online platforms. I'm writing a paper about Nazi propaganda and how its formal elements inspired later film. If anyone has a Taylor and Francis account, I'd really appreciate if you could help me access this one particular article.
353K subscribers in the NonCredibleDefense community. Reddit's (not so new) home for defense themed shitposts.
Credible military history and science. Members Online Using AP rounds against buildings/emplacements when you either don't have or run out of HE - how often did this happen in WW2?
Namaste, brothers™, sisters® and enbies©, As a reminder, r/noncredibledefense is now focused on seriousposting and peaceposting, and we are no longer allowing memes about war or any content that is not directly related to these topics.
48K subscribers in the NonCredibleDiplomacy community. shitposting about geopolitics and diplomcy and current events and stuff
One of my main publications, a Taylor and Francis book, seems to have been removed from Google Scholar, and replaced with entries for all its chapters. When I search for it now by its title it doesn't show, and the citations have gone from my profile. The chapters have almost no citations to their own names, my subject area works by citing the ...