Ads
related to: illinois auto lemon law in arizona free searchbumper.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Lemon law protection arises under state law, with every U.S. state and the District of Columbia having its own lemon law. [1] Although the exact criteria vary by state, new vehicle lemon laws require that an auto manufacturer repurchase a vehicle that has a significant defect that the manufacturer is unable to repair within a reasonable amount of time. [2]
Arizona v. Johnson, 555 U.S. 323 (2009), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held, by unanimous decision, that police may conduct a pat down search of a passenger in an automobile that has been lawfully stopped for a minor traffic violation, provided the police reasonably suspect the passenger is armed and dangerous.
Lemon law: ConnPIRG and CALPIRG were involved in passing the first new-car lemon laws in 1982 that require manufacturers to repair or repurchase severely defective relatively new vehicles. [12] Safer art supplies: CALPIRG led the effort to enact the nation's first laws protecting children and artists from toxins in art supplies in 1985. [13]
Arizona’s car insurance laws are similar to many other states and include: Proof of insurance: In Arizona, all drivers are required to carry auto insurance and keep proof of insurance ...
Lemon laws primarily serve to force manufacturers to buy back defective vehicles or exchange them. Depending on the jurisdiction, a process similar to vehicle title branding may also be used to warn subsequent purchasers of the history of a problem vehicle. While this portion of a vehicle's history is usually not retained with the title when ...
The Center for Auto Safety counts the enacting of lemon laws in all 50 states among its greatest successes. The Center has testified over 50 times before Congressional Committees on auto safety, warranties and service bulletins, air pollution, consumer protection, and fuel economy.
There have been 16 decisions which have simultaneously overruled more than one earlier decision; of these, three have simultaneously overruled four decisions each: the statutory law regarding habeas corpus decision Hensley v. Municipal Court, 411 U.S. 345 (1973), the constitutional law Eleventh Amendment (re: sovereign immunity) decision Edelman v.
Lemon v. Kurtzman: 403 U.S. 602 (1971) Laws without a secular purpose violate the Establishment Clause: Clay v. United States: 403 U.S. 698 (1971) Since the Appeal Board gave no reason for the denial of a conscientious objector exemption, petitioner's conviction must be reversed New York Times Co. v. United States: 403 U.S. 713 (1971)
Ad
related to: illinois auto lemon law in arizona free search