Ads
related to: mitigate against grammar problems- Free Grammar Checker
Check your grammar in seconds.
Feel confident in your writing.
- Free Writing Assistant
Improve grammar, punctuation,
conciseness, and more.
- Free Plagiarism Checker
Compare text to billions of web
pages and major content databases.
- Free Citation Generator
Get citations within seconds.
Never lose points over formatting.
- Free Spell Checker
Improve your spelling in seconds.
Avoid simple spelling errors.
- Free Essay Checker
Proofread your essay with ease.
Writing that makes the grade.
- Free Grammar Checker
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
militate and mitigate. To militate is to fight or exert pressure for something to happen or not to happen; it is typically followed by a preposition. To mitigate is to make something milder, typically something undesirable, and takes no preposition. Standard: The seriousness of your crime was mitigated by the provocation you were under.
This can create problems, as described by Reginald Close: Teachers and textbook writers often invent rules which their students and readers repeat and perpetuate. These rules are usually statements about English usage which the authors imagine to be, as a rule, true. But statements of this kind are extremely difficult to formulate both simply ...
In the English language, there are grammatical constructions that many native speakers use unquestioningly yet certain writers call incorrect. Differences of usage or opinion may stem from differences between formal and informal speech and other matters of register, differences among dialects (whether regional, class-based, generational, or other), difference between the social norms of spoken ...
Proponents of linguistic nativism suggest that the answer to the "no negative evidence" problem is that language knowledge that cannot be learned is innate. They argue that the language input is not rich enough for children to develop a fully developed grammar from the input alone. This view is referred to as the poverty of the stimulus ...
Construction grammar (often abbreviated CxG) is a family of theories within the field of cognitive linguistics which posit that constructions, or learned pairings of linguistic patterns with meanings, are the fundamental building blocks of human language.
Stephen J. Dubner described learning of the existence of Muphry's law in the "Freakonomics" section of The New York Times in July 2008. He had accused The Economist of a typo in referring to Cornish pasties being on sale in Mexico, assuming that "pastries" had been intended and being familiar only with the word "pasties" with the meaning of nipple coverings.
M-W mentions no usage problems, listing the disputed meaning second to its legal sense without comment. OED cites the non-legal noun and verb usages as colloquial and "orig[inally] U.S.". [8] Chambers deems this use "colloquial". [9] alright – An alternative to "all right" that some consider illiterate but others allow.
This pattern is consistent with two grammars. In one grammar, a long vowel bears stress if it is the last segment in the word. This is a rule based on absolute finality. In the other grammar, a long vowel bears stress only if it is the last vowel in the word (i.e., even if it is not the last segment of the word).