Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Case history; Prior: 816 F.2d 730, opinion modified and rehearing denied, 831 F.2d 1124 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (reversed): Holding; Disclosure of the contents of an FBI rap-sheet to a third party "could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy" within the meaning of Exemption 7(C), and therefore is prohibited by that Exemption
In addition to litigation [30] and filing amicus curie briefs, [31] Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press supports freedom of information in the United States through a number of free legal resources for those who gather and report the news. The Legal Hotline is available to journalists and media lawyers with legal questions.
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 445 U.S. 136 (1980), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the Freedom of Information Act. The Supreme Court ruled that Henry Kissinger was not required under the Act to turn over transcripts of phone conversations he made as an adviser to President Richard Nixon.
The Reporters Committee to launch Local Legal Initiative in Indiana to provide free legal support for local journalists and news organizations.
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749 (1989) United States Department of Justice v. Tax Analysts, 492 U.S. 136 (1989) John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp., 493 U.S. 146 (1989) United States Department of State v. Ray, 502 U.S. 164 (1991) Department of Justice v. Landano, 508 U.S. 165 (1993) United States Department of Defense v.
The reporters lost their case by a vote of 5–4. This case is cited for the rule that in federal courts, a reporter may not generally avoid testifying in a criminal grand jury, and is one of a limited number of cases [ 2 ] [ 3 ] in which the U.S. Supreme Court has considered the use of reporters' privilege .
Richmond Newspapers Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555 (1980), is a United States Supreme Court case involving issues of privacy in correspondence with the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, the freedom of the press, the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
CNN v. Trump; Court: United States District Court for the District of Columbia: Full case name: Cable News Network, Inc. and Abilio James Acosta v. Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States; John F. Kelly, in his official capacity as Chief of Staff to the President of the United States; William Shine, in his official capacity as Deputy Chief of Staff to the ...