When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: samples of interrogatories to defendant in court cases are required to give

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Interrogatories - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrogatories

    The injured plaintiff might serve interrogatories on the defendant driver seeking information that would support the plaintiff's theory of the case. If the plaintiff is alleging that the defendant was speeding, the plaintiff might ask the defendant to state the speed of the defendant's vehicle at the time of the accident.

  3. Civil discovery under United States federal law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_discovery_under...

    Section 15 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 provided: [A]ll the said courts of the United States, shall have power in the trial of actions at law, on motion and due notice thereof being given, to require the parties to produce books or writings in their possession or power, which contain evidence pertinent to the issue, in cases and under circumstances where they might be compelled to produce the ...

  4. Brady disclosure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_disclosure

    The Brady doctrine is a pretrial discovery rule that was established by the United States Supreme Court in Brady v. Maryland (1963). [2] The rule requires that the prosecution must turn over all exculpatory evidence to the defendant in a criminal case. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that might exonerate the defendant. [3]

  5. Discovery (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discovery_(law)

    Civil rights cases concluded in U.S. district courts, by disposition, 1990–2006 [1]. Discovery, in the law of common law jurisdictions, is a phase of pretrial procedure in a lawsuit in which each party, through the law of civil procedure, can obtain evidence from other parties.

  6. Frazier v. Cupp - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frazier_v._Cupp

    The Court agreed the prosecution did not emphasize Rawls's statements over other evidence and the statements alone were not "touted to the jury as a crucial part of the prosecution's case". [1] The Court ruled Frazier did not formally request an attorney, as required for Escobedo v. Illinois to apply, and Miranda v.

  7. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celotex_Corp._v._Catrett

    Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court.Written by Associate Justice William Rehnquist, the decision of the Court held that a party moving for summary judgment need show only that the opposing party lacks evidence sufficient to support its case.

  8. Exculpatory evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exculpatory_evidence

    The Brady doctrine is a pretrial discovery rule that was established by the United States Supreme Court in Brady v. Maryland (1963). [5] The rule requires that the prosecution must turn over all exculpatory evidence to the defendant in a criminal case. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that might exonerate the defendant. [6]

  9. Indiana v. Edwards - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_v._Edwards

    The Court had recognized these two rights on competency for some time. In Dusky v.United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960), and in Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (1975), the Court established the standard for competency to stand trial—the defendant must have a "rational and factual understanding" of the nature of the proceedings, and must be able to rationally assist his lawyer in defending him.