Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A simple concurring opinion arises when a judge joins the decision of the court but has something to add. Concurring in judgment means that the judge agrees with the majority decision (the case's ultimate outcome in terms of who wins and who loses) but not with the reasoning of the majority opinion (why one side wins and the other loses).
The choice is binding, but the student is rewarded with an earlier answer from the school, and a higher percentage chance of getting in. ... After applying to Cornell under the regular decision ...
Circuit court decisions are binding on the district courts within their jurisdiction, imposing some degree of uniformity. When an appeal from a decision of a court of appeals is taken to the federal high court , the Supreme Court of the United States , further uniformity is imposed, because the Supreme Court's decisions are binding on all lower ...
Early decision (ED) or early acceptance is a type of early admission used in college admissions in the United States for admitting freshmen to undergraduate programs.It is used to indicate to the university or college that the candidate considers that institution to be their top choice through a binding commitment to enroll; in other words, if offered admission under an ED program, and the ...
A college admissions program popular among the country’s most selective universities may actually be skewed against lower-income applicants, college consultants and experts say.
Early action (EA) is a type of early admission process offered by some institutions for admission to colleges and universities in the United States.Unlike the regular admissions process, EA usually requires students to submit an application by mid-October or early November of their senior year of high school instead of January 1.
A per curiam decision is one rendered by the court (or at least, a majority of the court) acting collectively and anonymously. [2] In contrast to regular opinions, a per curiam does not list the individual judge responsible for authoring the decision, [2] but minority dissenting and concurring decisions are signed. [3]
Its primary responsibility is the final appellate review of decisions by lower courts for errors of law. While, legally, a decision by the Federal Court of Justice is only binding with respect to the individual case in which it enters, de facto the court's interpretation of the law is followed by lower courts with almost no exception. [1]