When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: dr axe credibility guide to reading articles list of examples

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Vital articles/List of all level 1–4 vital articles

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vital_articles...

    This page lists all Vital articles. It is used in order to show recent changes. It is a temporary solution until phab:T117122 is resolved. The list contains 10,013 articles. --Cewbot 14:09, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

  3. Wikipedia:Assessing reliability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assessing...

    At the bottom of a good article, a section, usually called "References" or "Notes", will list sources that were used in writing the article. If this list is extensive the article is generally reliable. Articles of high reliability will often contain both online sources (freely accessible via the Web) and offline sources (books or scholarly ...

  4. Wikipedia : Potentially unreliable sources

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Potentially...

    Examples of such promotional journals include Creation Research Society Quarterly, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, and Homeopathy. Be aware of predatory publishers, for example journals published by OMICS Publishing Group. These are very unlikely to be accepted as reliable sources.

  5. Wikipedia:Tiers of reliability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tiers_of_reliability

    It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.

  6. Wikipedia:Good articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_articles

    A good article (GA) is a Wikipedia article that meets a core set of editorial standards, the good article criteria, passing through the good article nomination process successfully. They are well-written, contain factually accurate and verifiable information, are broad in coverage, neutral in point of view , stable, and illustrated, where ...

  7. Wikipedia talk : Identifying reliable sources (medicine ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Identifying...

    Research findings are primary sources, so they are always superior. If you can read the report, you can evaluate the validity of the finding first-hand. Reviews are hearsay. Reviews are excellent sources - when they are published in peer-reviewed academic journals. In my field, for example, there are entire journals devoted to this kind of work.

  8. Wikipedia:Evaluating sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Evaluating_sources

    Sources of information are commonly categorized as primary, secondary, or tertiary sources.In brief, a primary source is one close to the event with firsthand knowledge (for example, an eyewitness); a secondary source is at least one step removed (for example, a book about an event written by someone not involved in it); and a tertiary source is an encyclopaedia or textbook that provides a ...

  9. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. This means that we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, and not those of Wikipedians, who have read and interpreted primary source material for themselves.