When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Most_Published...

    Even if a study meets the benchmark requirements for and , and is free of bias, there is still a 36% probability that a paper reporting a positive result will be incorrect; if the base probability of a true result is lower, then this will push the PPV lower too. Furthermore, there is strong evidence that the average statistical power of a study ...

  3. Wikipedia:No original research - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research

    The only way you can show that your edit is not original research is to cite a reliable published source that contains the same material. Even with well-sourced material, if you use it out of context, or to state or imply a conclusion not directly and explicitly supported by the source, you are engaging in original research; see below.

  4. Wikipedia:Requests for comment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RFC

    The statement should be self-contained, and should not assume that the section title is available (because the section title will not be copied to the RfC list pages). A long statement (including wiki markup), may be truncated or may fail to be copied at all. If you have more information to say concerning the issue, first, provide (and sign ...

  5. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (science) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    If a reliable and comprehensive review article cites a study, result, or idea, the review should usually be cited in preference to the primary source. If a primary source is cited by few or no reliable sources outside the originating lab, the primary source may be removed as not reporting an important result.

  6. Wikipedia:Verifiability

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability

    Wikipedia or the sister project is a primary source in this case and may be used following the policy for primary sources. Any such use should avoid original research, undue emphasis on Wikipedia's role or views, and inappropriate self-reference. The article text should clarify how the material is sourced from Wikipedia to inform the reader ...

  7. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    You can find instant answers on our AOL Mail help page. Should you need additional assistance we have experts available around the clock at 800-730-2563.

  8. Misuse of statistics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misuse_of_statistics

    The source may incorrectly use a method or interpret a result. The source is a statistician, not a subject matter expert. [7] An expert should know when the numbers being compared describe different things. Numbers change, as reality does not, when legal definitions or political boundaries change.

  9. Fix problems signing in to AOL Mail

    help.aol.com/articles/fix-problems-signing-in-to...

    While you'll need to contact your software vendor for specifics to your software, most browsers will allow you a temporary bypass by holding down the Shift key as you click web site links. Additionally, try using the following friendly URLs when accessing AOL Mail: "*.aol.com" "registration.aol.com" "webmail.aol.com"

  1. Related searches why you should not assume the following results are reported directly

    why are most published findings falsewhy are most research findings false