When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Illustrated_Book_of_Bad...

    An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments is a book on critical thinking written by Ali Almossawi and illustrated by Alejandro Giraldo. The book describes 19 logical fallacies using a set of illustrations, in which various cartoon characters participate. The online version of the book was published under a Creative Commons license on July 15, 2013. [1]

  3. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Proving too much – an argument that results in an overly generalized conclusion (e.g.: arguing that drinking alcohol is bad because in some instances it has led to spousal or child abuse). Psychologist's fallacy – an observer presupposes the objectivity of their own perspective when analyzing a behavioral event.

  4. Argument map - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_map

    A box and line diagram. Argument maps can also represent counterarguments. In the following diagram, the two objections weaken the contention, while the reasons support the premise of the objection: A sample argument using objections. Some argument mapping conventions allow for perspicuous representation of inferences. [12]

  5. Ali Almossawi - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Almossawi

    Ali Almossawi (born December 1, 1984) is an author of books on critical thinking and computer science education, and the creator of An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments.He is also a principal engineer at Apple, [1] [2] and was formerly a data visualization engineer at Mozilla. [3]

  6. 'Bad faith arguments' by politicians, school authorities are ...

    www.aol.com/bad-faith-arguments-politicians...

    Educating future citizens about all aspects of human life is vital for the healthy functioning of democracy. Book bans suppresses that.

  7. Two wrongs don't make a right - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_wrongs_don't_make_a_right

    In rhetoric and ethics, "two wrongs don't make a right" and "two wrongs make a right" are phrases that denote philosophical norms. "Two wrongs make a right" has been considered as a fallacy of relevance, in which an allegation of wrongdoing is countered with a similar allegation.

  8. Sorites paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorites_paradox

    The continuum fallacy (also known as the fallacy of the beard, [44] [45] line-drawing fallacy, or decision-point fallacy [46]) is an informal fallacy related to the sorites paradox. Both fallacies cause one to erroneously reject a vague claim simply because it is not as precise as one would like it to be. Vagueness alone does not necessarily ...

  9. ‘A new chapter of a very old story’: Documentary shows Bad ...

    www.aol.com/chapter-very-old-story-documentary...

    The Line 5 pipeline has been operating on 12 miles of the Bad River Band's land with expired easements for more than a decade. The Band and the Canadian company have been locked in a legal battle ...