Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Federal rules that impact virtually every aspect of everyday life, from the food we eat and the cars we drive to the air we breathe, could be at risk after a wide-ranging Supreme Court ruling Friday.
By January, the Biden administration's Environmental Protection Agency had not acted on California's 15-month-old request for a waiver to federal rules that would allow Advanced Clean Trucks rules ...
The Supreme Court put the latest iteration of the regulation on hold last week after a lower court — in a decision that did not cite Chevron — said the new pollution rules could be implemented.
The Chevron decision essentially gave federal agencies the authority to issue rules to implement laws that weren't clear. And that deference to the executive branch has enabled presidential administrations from both parties to use rulemaking to create policy, especially in times of deep partisan division in Washington.
In the decades following the ruling, Chevron has been a bedrock of modern administrative law, requiring judges to defer to agencies’ reasonable interpretations of congressional statutes. But the current high court, with a 6-3 conservative majority has been increasingly skeptical of the powers of federal agencies.
The Supreme Court’s ‘Chevron’ ruling is an existential threat to the ‘American economic miracle’ and will make the U.S. more like Europe, Lazard chair says Jason Ma July 20, 2024 at 3:50 PM
Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc., 544 U.S. 528 (2005), [2] was a landmark case in United States regulatory takings law whereby the Court expressly overruled precedent created in Agins v.
After 40 years, the Supreme Court overturns its landmark 'Chevron' ruling, but are the implications for healthcare and environmental regulations good or bad news for businesses and consumers?