Ads
related to: three certainties trusts case search- Estate Planning Guide
Wills? Trusts?
What do you need?
- 13 Retirement Blunders
Retire at ease, avoid these errors.
Blunder #9: buying annuities.
- 8 Major Investor Mistakes
Learn the 8 biggest mistakes
investors make & how to avoid them.
- 401(k) and IRA Tips
Learn the differences.
Is it time to rollover your 401(k)?
- Estate Planning Guide
legal.thomsonreuters.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
courtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Discretionary trusts are trusts which require that the trustees exercise their powers, in the same way as a fixed trust, but allow some discretion in how to do so, in a similar manner to mere powers. Since trustees hold the discretionary power to choose how to act under an established boundary set out by the settlor of a trust, evidential ...
Knight v Knight (1840) 49 ER 58 is an English trusts law case, embodying a simple statement of the "three certainties" principle. This has the effect of determining whether assets can be disposed of in wills , or whether the wording of the will is too vague to allow beneficiaries to collect what appears on the face of the will to be theirs.
Three certainties Hunter v Moss [1994] 1 WLR 452 is an English trusts law case from the Court of Appeal concerning the certainty of subject matter necessary to form a trust. Moss promised Hunter 50 shares in his company as part of an employment contract, but failed to provide them.
Certainty refers to the three certainties required for a trust to be valid. The trust instrument must show certainty of intention to create a trust, certainty of what the subject matter of the trust is, and certainty of who the beneficiaries (or objects) are. Where there is uncertainty for whatever reason, the trust will fail, although the ...
Paul v Constance [1976] EWCA Civ 2 / [1977] 1 W.L.R. 527 is an English trust law case. It sets out what will be sufficient to establish that someone has intended to create a trust, the first of the "three certainties".
Julie Cotant, a senior trust officer with Plante Moran Trust, testified Wednesday for the prosecution that the notes are owed to Valade's 2009 irrevocable trust and a review of the records on each ...
The case fundamentally restated the law in relation to certainty of objects for discretionary trusts, one of the three certainties required to form a trust. [ 2 ] For a trust to be valid, "It is clear law that a trust (other than a charitable trust ) must be for ascertainable beneficiaries".
Generally, a private express trust requires three elements to be certain, which together are known as the "three certainties". These elements were determined in Knight v Knight to be intention, subject matter and objects. [16] The certainty of intention allows the court to ascertain a settlor's true reason for creating the trust.