Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
On the other hand, there are also integrals that have an improper Riemann integral but do not have a (proper) Lebesgue integral, such as . The Lebesgue theory does not see this as a deficiency: from the point of view of measure theory , ∫ 0 ∞ sin x x d x = ∞ − ∞ {\textstyle \int _{0}^{\infty }{\frac {\sin x}{x}}\,dx=\infty ...
The result of the procedure for principal value is the same as the ordinary integral; since it no longer matches the definition, it is technically not a "principal value". The Cauchy principal value can also be defined in terms of contour integrals of a complex-valued function f ( z ) : z = x + i y , {\displaystyle f(z):z=x+i\,y\;,} with x , y ...
In calculus and mathematical analysis the limits of integration (or bounds of integration) of the integral () of a Riemann integrable function f {\displaystyle f} defined on a closed and bounded interval are the real numbers a {\displaystyle a} and b {\displaystyle b} , in which a {\displaystyle a} is called the lower limit and b {\displaystyle ...
In integral calculus, Euler's formula for complex numbers may be used to evaluate integrals involving trigonometric functions. Using Euler's formula, any trigonometric function may be written in terms of complex exponential functions, namely e i x {\displaystyle e^{ix}} and e − i x {\displaystyle e^{-ix}} and then integrated.
In mathematics, the comparison test, sometimes called the direct comparison test to distinguish it from similar related tests (especially the limit comparison test), provides a way of deducing whether an infinite series or an improper integral converges or diverges by comparing the series or integral to one whose convergence properties are known.
In mathematics, the integral test for convergence is a method used to test infinite series of monotonic terms for convergence. It was developed by Colin Maclaurin and Augustin-Louis Cauchy and is sometimes known as the Maclaurin–Cauchy test .
This integral is improper at the upper limit of ∞, and possibly also at zero. It exists, with the allowance that it may be infinite. [5] [6] As above, the integral of a Lebesgue integrable (not necessarily non-negative) function is defined by subtracting the integral of its positive and negative parts.
If one is willing to use improper integrals and compute the Cauchy principal value, one obtains =, which can also be argued by symmetry (since the logarithm is odd), so =, so it makes no difference if the definite integral is based at 1 or −1. As with the indefinite integral, this is special to the real numbers, and does not extend over the ...