When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Brick_Co._v._Illinois

    Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), is a United States Supreme Court case that involved issues concerning statutory standing in antitrust law.. The decision established the rule that indirect purchasers of goods or services along a supply chain cannot seek damages for antitrust violations committed by the original manufacturer or service provider, but it permitted such claims ...

  3. MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Department of Revenue

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MeadWestvaco_Corp._v...

    MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue, 553 U.S. 16 (2008), is a United States Supreme Court case concerning the extent a state may tax companies that are not based in their state. [ 1 ] Background

  4. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blonder-Tongue_Labs.,_Inc...

    Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois Foundation, 402 U.S. 313 (1971), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court holding that a final judgment in an infringement suit against a first defendant that a patent is invalid bars the patentee from relitigating the same patent against other defendants. [1]

  5. Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibb_v._Navajo_Freight...

    Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc., 359 U.S. 520 (1959), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Illinois law requiring trucks to have unique mudguards was unconstitutional under the Commerce clause.

  6. Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Tool_Works_Inc._v...

    Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the application of U.S. antitrust law to "tying" arrangements of patented products. [1]

  7. Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_Pesos,_Inc._v._Taco...

    The Lanham Act prohibits "the deceptive and misleading use of marks" to protect business owners "against unfair competition." [4] The Act defines trademarks as "any word, name, symbol, or device or any combination thereof" used by any person "to identify and distinguish his or her goods, including a unique product, from those manufactured or sold by others and to indicate the source of the ...

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Veeck v. Southern Building Code Congress Int'l - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veeck_v._Southern_Building...

    In deciding that the municipal building codes in this case could be freely copied, the court relied on the First Circuit's decision in Building Officials & Code Administrators v. Code Technology, Inc., [23] (BOCA)—the only other appellate case addressing a similar enactment of a model building code. The court distinguished cases from the ...