Ads
related to: 60 hz vs 144 240 gb computer storage drive
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The first HDD [11] had an average seek time of about 600 ms. [12] and by the middle 1970s, HDDs were available with seek times of about 25 ms. [13]Some early PC drives used a stepper motor to move the heads, and as a result had seek times as slow as 80–120 ms, but this was quickly improved by voice coil type actuation in the 1980s, reducing seek times to around 20 ms.
DisplayPort version 1.3 added support for 5K at 60 Hz over a single cable, whereas version 1.2 was only capable of 5K at 30 Hz. Early 5K 60 Hz displays such as the Dell UltraSharp UP2715K and HP DreamColor Z27q that lacked DisplayPort 1.3 support required two DisplayPort 1.2 connections to operate at 60 Hz, in a tiled display mode similar to ...
The physical phenomena on which the device relies (such as spinning platters in a hard drive) will also impose limits; for instance, no spinning platter shipping in 2009 saturates SATA revision 2.0 (3 Gbit/s), so moving from this 3 Gbit/s interface to USB 3.0 at 4.8 Gbit/s for one spinning drive will result in no increase in realized transfer rate.
These new drives, dubbed by the press as the X25-M and X18-M G2 [7] [8] (or generation 2), reduced prices by up to 60 percent while offering lower latency and improved performance. [ 9 ] On February 1, 2010, Intel and Micron announced that they were gearing up for production of NAND flash memory using a new 25-nanometer process. [ 10 ]
Four times the resolution of 1080p. Requires a dual-link DVI, category 2 (high-speed) HDMI, DisplayPort or a single Thunderbolt link, and a reduced scan rate (up to 30 Hz); a DisplayPort 1.2 connection can support this resolution at 60 Hz, or 30 Hz in stereoscopic 3D. 3840×2160 (8,294k) 3840 2160 8,294,400 16:9 24 bpp DCI 4K
330,000 read IOPS, 330,000 write IOPS on 512 GB model Up to [neutrality is disputed] 3.5 GB/s sequential read, 2.1 GB/s sequential write [25] Kaminario K2 SSD Up to [neutrality is disputed] 2,000,000 IOPS. [27] 1,200,000 IOPS in SPC-1 benchmark simulating business applications [28] [29] FC: MLC Flash: NetApp FAS6240 cluster Flash/Disk