When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Supertask - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supertask

    In philosophy, a supertask is a countably infinite sequence of operations that occur sequentially within a finite interval of time. [1] Supertasks are called hypertasks when the number of operations becomes uncountably infinite .

  3. Thomson's lamp - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomson's_lamp

    The thought experiment concerns a lamp that is toggled on and off with increasing frequency. Thomson's lamp is a philosophical puzzle based on infinites. It was devised in 1954 by British philosopher James F. Thomson, who used it to analyze the possibility of a supertask, which is the completion of an infinite number of tasks.

  4. Category:Supertasks - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Supertasks

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us

  5. Ross–Littlewood paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross–Littlewood_paradox

    A graph that shows the number of balls in and out of the vase for the first ten iterations of the problem. The Ross–Littlewood paradox (also known as the balls and vase problem or the ping pong ball problem) is a hypothetical problem in abstract mathematics and logic designed to illustrate the paradoxical, or at least non-intuitive, nature of infinity.

  6. List of philosophical problems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_philosophical_problems

    Can human activity and agency change the objective structure of the world? These questions continue to receive much attention in the philosophy of science. A clear "yes" to the first question is a hallmark of the scientific realism perspective. Philosophers such as Bas van Fraassen have important and interesting answers to the second question.

  7. Models of scientific inquiry - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Models_of_scientific_inquiry

    The philosophy of science includes the question: What criteria are satisfied by a 'good' theory. This question has a long history, and many scientists, as well as philosophers, have considered it. The objective is to be able to choose one theory as preferable to another without introducing cognitive bias. [4]

  8. James F. Thomson (philosopher) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_F._Thomson_(philosopher)

    Thomson's conditions for the experiment are insufficiently complete, since only instants of time before t≡1 are considered. Benacerraf's essay led to a renewed interest in infinity-related problems, set theory and the foundation of supertask theory.

  9. Paradoxes of set theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradoxes_of_set_theory

    One example, known as the Barber paradox, states: The male barber who shaves all and only men who do not shave themselves has to shave himself only if he does not shave himself. There are close similarities between Russell's paradox in set theory and the Grelling–Nelson paradox, which demonstrates a paradox in natural language.