Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Wal-Mart v. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a group of roughly 1.5 million women could not be certified as a valid class of plaintiffs in a class-action lawsuit for employment discrimination against Walmart. Lead plaintiff Betty Dukes, a Walmart employee, and others alleged gender ...
The lawsuit, filed in federal court on Feb. 9, alleges that the store discriminated against a Black woman based on her gender and race, denying her a promotion and clean area to express breast ...
Wal-Mart is in the midst of a legal battle which could become the largest employment discrimination lawsuit in the Unites States. The lawsuit Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. started in 2001. Seven ...
A Wal-Mart Stores Inc employee sued the retailer on Tuesday, saying its prior policy of denying health insurance benefits to the spouses of gay employees violated gender discrimination laws. The ...
tech-employment sex and race discrimination: San Mateo County Superior Court: 2015 Huang v. Twitter: class action sex discrimination lawsuit: 2015 [1] J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. Intentional discrimination on the basis of sex by state actors in the use of peremptory strikes in jury selection: United States Supreme Court: 1994 Ledbetter v.
According to a consultant hired by plaintiffs in a sex discrimination lawsuit, in 2001, Walmart's EEOC filings showed that female employees made up 65 percent of Walmart's hourly paid workforce, but only 33 percent of its management. [150] [151] Just 35 percent of its store managers were women, compared to 57 percent at similar retailers. [151]
A Walmart employee who alleges managers told her they didn't promote her because she'd had a baby and might leave the store gets a $60,000 settlement. Walmart settles Ottumwa worker's gender ...
Mauldin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. was a sexual discrimination class action lawsuit filed on October 16, 2001, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, seeking back pay and an injunction. The suit challenged Walmart's denial of health insurance coverage for prescription contraceptives. [1]