Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The non-free use you're proposing is bascially a WP:DECORATIVE type of non-free use, and it's not really considered policy-compliant to use non-free images in list articles or in a list-, a gallery- or a table-like display per WP:NFLIST and WP:NFTABLE simply to show what one of a group of entries looks like. If the rationale you posted above ...
Is the tag Template:Non-free media rationale not satisfying when adding fair use in any uploaded photo? Some users do use this template on other photos but I was just surprised when BetacommandBot posted comments on my talk page regarding the Disputed fair use rationale for Images. BritandBeyonce (talk•contribs) 08:08, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
If for example a fair use reason has to be provided to enable the template to present the infobox at all, then the rules are satisified. The problem will be getting admins and bots to recognise a new way of complying with the fair use copyright rules. I also agee that the royal commission article is not correct fair use.
Fair use is a doctrine in United States law that permits limited use of copyrighted material without having to first acquire permission from the copyright holder. Fair use is one of the limitations to copyright intended to balance the interests of copyright holders with the public interest in the wider distribution and use of creative works by ...
Commons does accept any images under fair use; so it would surely be deleted there. —teb728 t c 20:28, 10 March 2015 (UTC) oops s/b "does not accept" (thanks Aspro) —teb728 t c 20:50, 10 March 2015 (UTC) Whoops! See what I meant. TEB728 is a WC contributor and knows the ins-and-outs of copyright and fair use.
If the image is tagged as Fair use, then most probably you cannot.See the Fair use section for more details. You can for all other images released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License or a similarly free license provided you abide by the license conditions – include a link back to the wikipage for that picture or to the creator's website and license any ...
Flickr.com has some really good photos of Erie that could be used on wikipedia. It says public in the corner, so does that mean they are in the PD? If not, what is the policy for
The court noted that the four factors enumerated in the fair use statute are not exclusive, but are only a guide in the analysis. The court held that it was irrelevant whether Carol Publishing continued to distribute The SAT after Castle Rock notified it of its infringement claim, because such distribution would have been justified if the book was a fair use of Seinfeld.