Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
When an exponent is a positive integer, that exponent indicates how many copies of the base are multiplied together. For example, 3 5 = 3 · 3 · 3 · 3 · 3 = 243. The base 3 appears 5 times in the multiplication, because the exponent is 5.
Fermat's Last Theorem states that no three positive integers (a, b, c) can satisfy the equation a n + b n = c n for any integer value of n greater than 2. (For n equal to 1, the equation is a linear equation and has a solution for every possible a and b.
Bernoulli's inequality can be proved for case 2, in which is a non-negative integer and , using mathematical induction in the following form: we prove the inequality for r ∈ { 0 , 1 } {\displaystyle r\in \{0,1\}} ,
The six most common definitions of the exponential function = for real values are as follows.. Product limit. Define by the limit: = (+).; Power series. Define e x as the value of the infinite series = =! = + +! +! +! + (Here n! denotes the factorial of n.
holds for every integer a coprime to n. In algebraic terms, λ(n) is the exponent of the multiplicative group of integers modulo n. As this is a finite abelian group, there must exist an element whose order equals the exponent, λ(n). Such an element is called a primitive λ-root modulo n.
Values of t such that 2 t is an integer are all of the form t = log 2 m for some integer m, while for 3 t to be an integer, t must be of the form t = log 3 n for some integer n. By setting x 1 = 1, x 2 = t , y 1 = log(2), and y 2 = log(3), the four exponentials conjecture implies that if t is irrational then one of the following four numbers is ...
Solving for , = = = = = Thus, the power rule applies for rational exponents of the form /, where is a nonzero natural number. This can be generalized to rational exponents of the form p / q {\displaystyle p/q} by applying the power rule for integer exponents using the chain rule, as shown in the next step.
To compare numbers in scientific notation, say 5×10 4 and 2×10 5, compare the exponents first, in this case 5 > 4, so 2×10 5 > 5×10 4. If the exponents are equal, the mantissa (or coefficient) should be compared, thus 5×10 4 > 2×10 4 because 5 > 2.