When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: lgbtq discrimination examples in the workplace policy and rules pdf

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. LGBTQ employment discrimination in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_employment...

    In 2020, 8.9% of employed LGBT people, including 11.3% of LGBT employees of color and 6.5% of white LGBT employees, reported being fired or not hired because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. 29.0% of LGBT employees of color said they were not hired because of their LGBT status, compared to 18.3% of white LGBT employees.

  3. Corporate Equality Index - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_Equality_Index

    The CEI criteria are established by four main pillars: "non-discrimination policies across business entities, equitable benefits for LGBTQ workers and their families, internal education and accountability metrics to promote LGBTQ inclusion competency, [and] public commitment to LGBTQ equality". [4]

  4. Bostock v. Clayton County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bostock_v._Clayton_County

    Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality or gender identity.

  5. Supreme Court Rules LGBTQ Employees Are Protected From ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-rules-lgbtq...

    The momentous decision finds that federal law protects employees from discrimination for sexual orientation and gender identity. Supreme Court Rules LGBTQ Employees Are Protected From ...

  6. Plaintiffs in Supreme Court's LGBTQ workplace ruling ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/plaintiffs-supreme-courts-lgbtq...

    The three plaintiffs in the Supreme Court’s landmark LGBTQ workplace discrimination ruling were inducted into the U.S. Department of Labor’s Hall of Honor on Wednesday.. Gerald Bostock, Aimee ...

  7. Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altitude_Express,_Inc._v...

    Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court civil rights case which ruled that under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 employees could not be discriminated against on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

  8. Title IX rules that expand LGBTQ+ protections blocked in 14 ...

    www.aol.com/title-ix-rules-expand-lgbtq...

    The rules expanded the definition of sex-based discrimination to include discrimination based on gender identity, sexual orientation, gender stereotypes and pregnancy.

  9. Executive Order 13672 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13672

    While campaigning for the presidency in 2008, Obama had promised an executive order banning workplace discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. [4] On the basis of his campaign statement's, LGBT activists had long expected President Obama to issue an executive order prohibiting government contractors from discriminating on the basis of ...