Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Union nationale des entraîneurs et cadres techniques professionnels du football (Unectef) v Georges Heylens and others, C-222/86, judgment dated 15 October 1987, ruled that it must be possible for a worker to challenge a refusal to recognise the equivalence of a diploma. George Heylens in this case was a Belgian footballer.
Spiliada has since been adopted in numerous jurisdictions including Canada, [3] Singapore, [4] New Zealand, [5] and Hong Kong. [6] The standard, however, has been rejected by Australia, where it has been held that a local court can only decline to exercise jurisdiction if it can be established that it is a clearly inappropriate forum. [7]
6 March Human rights, Human Rights Act 1998 Article 2 of the ECHR: The court allowed an appeal against a stay on the award of damages under the Human Rights Act 1998 s 8 for breach of Article 2 of the ECHR confirming that a claim for damages can run concurrently with an inquest. [9] KV (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ...
An arrêt (judgment) of the court of appeals may be further appealed en cassation. If the appeal is admissible at the cour de cassation , that court does not re-judge the facts of the matter a third time, but may investigate and verify whether the rules of law were properly applied by the lower courts.
A latae sententiae penalty is a penalty that is inflicted ipso facto, automatically, by force of the law itself, at the very moment a law is contravened, hence a broadly applied judgment. A ferendae sententiae penalty is a penalty that is inflicted on a guilty party only after a case has been brought and decided by an authority in the Church. [2]
Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee urged Attorney General Merrick Garland to release the re st of special counsel Jack Smith's report on President-elect Donald Trump's handling of ...
Lord Hoffmann in his judgment summarised the facts in the three linked cases: In OBG Ltd v Allan [2005] QB 762 the defendants were receivers purportedly appointed under a floating charge which is admitted to have been invalid. Acting in good faith, they took control of the claimant company's assets and undertaking.
Olley v Marlborough Court Hotel [1949] 1 KB 532, on incorporation of exclusion clauses in contract law.; Metropolitan Borough and the Town Clerk of Lewisham v Roberts [1949] 2 K.B. 608 (C.A.) — Dissenting, an executive body should not be allowed to gain title of a man's land if only possession was required for their purpose.