Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The rule against perpetuities serves a number of purposes. First, English courts have long recognized that allowing owners to attach long-lasting contingencies to their property harms the ability of future generations to freely buy and sell the property, since few people would be willing to buy property that had unresolved issues regarding its ownership hanging over it.
The majority of courts will require at least two years of continued at-will employment to support a non-compete agreement (or any other type of restrictive covenant). However, in certain cases involving particularly sharp conduct by an employee, courts have required less.
In general, he said, covenants that have not been preserved by being re-recorded within the 30-year period will be extinguished under the North Carolina Marketable Title Act.
Restrictions are normally limited in duration, geographical area (an "area covenant"), [30] and content. [31] In the Crown dependencies, many financial and other institutions require employees to sign 10-year or longer CNCs which could be seen to apply even if they leave the country or enter an unrelated field of work. [citation needed]
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The risk of an undisclosed restrictive covenant coming to the notice of a buyer or developer after they have acquired a site has been seen as especially high in regard to infill residential development. Restrictive covenant indemnity insurance is often available to mitigate this risk. [17]
"Let's negotiate this where both parties come out not in court and fighting for 20 years," he said. "Let's work it out together." Reach reporter Bailey Loosemore at bloosemore@courier-journal.com ...
Davidson Bros., Inc. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc., 643 A.2d 642 (App. Div. 1994), was a case decided by the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey that first applied public policy considerations instead of the touch and concern doctrine when deciding the validity of a restrictive covenant.