When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: restrictive covenant form

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Non-compete clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-compete_clause

    In contract law, a non-compete clause (often NCC), restrictive covenant, or covenant not to compete (CNC), is a clause under which one party (usually an employee) agrees not to enter into or start a similar profession or trade in competition against another party (usually the employer).

  3. What is a restrictive covenant? And how are they used today ...

    www.aol.com/restrictive-covenant-used-today-nc...

    Restrictive covenants have a complex and sordid history. From the 1920s to the 1960s, racially restrictive covenants became a common tool to prevent racial, ethnic and religious minorities from ...

  4. Non-compete clauses in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-compete_clauses_in_the...

    Additionally, the law further codified the common law concerning non-compete agreements in that (1) a non-compete covenant must be no greater than is required for the protection of a legitimate business interest of the employer, (2) the non-compete covenant must not impose an undue hardship on the employee, and (3) the non-compete covenant must ...

  5. Covenant (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covenant_(law)

    In property law, land-related covenants are called "real covenants", " covenants, conditions and restrictions " (CCRs) or "deed restrictions" and are a major form of covenant, typically imposing restrictions on how the land may be used (negative covenants) or requiring a certain continuing action (affirmative covenant).

  6. What is a restrictive covenant? And how are they used today ...

    www.aol.com/news/restrictive-covenant-used-today...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. Tulk v Moxhay - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulk_v_Moxhay

    Restrictive covenant Tulk v Moxhay is a landmark English land law case which decided that in certain cases a restrictive covenant can "run with the land" (i.e. a future owner will be subject to the restriction) in equity .