When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Napue v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napue_v._Illinois

    Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the knowing use of false testimony by a prosecutor in a criminal case violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if the testimony affects only the credibility of the witness and does not directly relate to the innocence or guilt of ...

  3. Judicial misconduct - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_misconduct

    Judicial misconduct occurs when a judge acts in ways that are considered unethical or otherwise violate the judge's obligations of impartial conduct.. Actions that can be classified as judicial misconduct include: conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts (as an extreme example: "falsification of facts" at summary judgment); using the ...

  4. Rivera v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rivera_v._Illinois

    Unsatisfied with this explanation, the Illinois Supreme Court held that Rivera was wrongly denied his challenge to dismiss the juror. The state supreme court found no evidence that Rivera's attorney used discriminatory considerations in arguing for the dismissal of the juror in question. Despite this, the state supreme court decided that such a ...

  5. Appeals court affirms dismissal of Rep. Bost’s lawsuit over ...

    www.aol.com/appeals-court-affirms-dismissal-rep...

    The 2-1 decision from the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago affirms a ruling from U.S. District Judge John Kness last year that five-term U.S. Rep. Mike Bost of Murphysboro and two GOP ...

  6. Griffin v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griffin_v._Illinois

    The defendants then filed a petition under the Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. ch. 38 §§ 826–832), under which only questions arising under the State or Federal Constitution could be raised, to obtain a certified copy of the entire record for their appeal, alleging that there were manifest nonconstitutional errors in the trial that entitled them to have their ...

  7. Operation Greylord - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Greylord

    Operation Greylord was an investigation conducted jointly by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the IRS Criminal Investigation Division, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, the Chicago Police Department Internal Affairs Division and the Illinois State Police into corruption in the judiciary of Cook County, Illinois (the Chicago jurisdiction).

  8. Illinois judge refuses to dismiss case against father of ...

    www.aol.com/news/judge-decide-father-man-accused...

    The court's rulings mean Crimo Jr.'s Nov. 6 trial will go head as previously scheduled. Illinois judge refuses to dismiss case against father of parade shooting suspect Skip to main content

  9. Taylor v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_v._Illinois

    Illinois, 484 U.S. 400 (1988), is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that defense witnesses can be prevented from testifying under certain circumstances, even if that hurts the defense's case. [1]