Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Radon transform. Maps f on the (x, y)-domain to Rf on the (α, s)-domain.. In mathematics, the Radon transform is the integral transform which takes a function f defined on the plane to a function Rf defined on the (two-dimensional) space of lines in the plane, whose value at a particular line is equal to the line integral of the function over that line.
Take a two-dimensional function f(r), project (e.g. using the Radon transform) it onto a (one-dimensional) line, and do a Fourier transform of that projection. Take that same function, but do a two-dimensional Fourier transform first, and then slice it through its origin, which is parallel to the projection line. In operator terms, if
In the mathematical field of integral geometry, the Funk transform (also known as Minkowski–Funk transform, Funk–Radon transform or spherical Radon transform) is an integral transform defined by integrating a function on great circles of the sphere. It was introduced by Paul Funk in 1911, based on the work of Minkowski (1904).
In mathematics, integral geometry is the theory of measures on a geometrical space invariant under the symmetry group of that space. In more recent times, the meaning has been broadened to include a view of invariant (or equivariant) transformations from the space of functions on one geometrical space to the space of functions on another geometrical space.
In practice of tomographic image reconstruction, often a stabilized and discretized version of the inverse Radon transform is used, known as the filtered back projection algorithm. [ 2 ] With a sampled discrete system, the inverse Radon transform is
The circle polynomials of Zernike ... There is also an account of the Radon transform developed in 1917, ... Toggle the table of contents.
Language links are at the top of the page across from the title.
A probability measure assigns length one to the circle. The 1/2π is necessary to get a total length of one, so the two definitions are equivalent. I can attest that this is precisely how Helgason defines the dual Radon transform, but there may be other normalization conventions in the literature (I don't know).