Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Full width at half maximum. In a distribution, full width at half maximum (FWHM) is the difference between the two values of the independent variable at which the dependent variable is equal to half of its maximum value. In other words, it is the width of a spectrum curve measured between those points on the y-axis which are half the maximum ...
A random variable with values in a measurable space (,) (usually with the Borel sets as measurable subsets) has as probability distribution the pushforward measure X ∗ P on (,): the density of with respect to a reference measure on (,) is the Radon–Nikodym derivative: =.
Factors affecting the width of the CI include the sample size, the variability in the sample, and the confidence level. [4] All else being the same, a larger sample produces a narrower confidence interval, greater variability in the sample produces a wider confidence interval, and a higher confidence level produces a wider confidence interval. [5]
The key difference from Scott's rule is that this rule does not assume the data is normally distributed and the bin width only depends on the number of samples, not on any properties of the data.
In descriptive statistics, the range of a set of data is size of the narrowest interval which contains all the data. It is calculated as the difference between the largest and smallest values (also known as the sample maximum and minimum). [1] It is expressed in the same units as the data.
Decide the width of the classes, denoted by h and obtained by = (assuming the class intervals are the same for all classes). Generally the class interval or class width is the same for all classes. The classes all taken together must cover at least the distance from the lowest value (minimum) in the data to the highest (maximum) value.
The table shown on the right can be used in a two-sample t-test to estimate the sample sizes of an experimental group and a control group that are of equal size, that is, the total number of individuals in the trial is twice that of the number given, and the desired significance level is 0.05. [4]
Confidence bands can be constructed around estimates of the empirical distribution function.Simple theory allows the construction of point-wise confidence intervals, but it is also possible to construct a simultaneous confidence band for the cumulative distribution function as a whole by inverting the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, or by using non-parametric likelihood methods.