When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. HMAC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMAC

    For example, SHA-256 operates on 512-bit blocks. The size of the output of HMAC is the same as that of the underlying hash function (e.g., 256 and 512 bits in the case of SHA-256 and SHA3-512, respectively), although it can be truncated if desired. HMAC does not encrypt the message.

  3. Message authentication code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_authentication_code

    where A S(k, · ) denotes that A has access to the oracle S(k, · ), and Query(A S(k, · ), 1 n) denotes the set of the queries on S made by A, which knows n. Clearly we require that any adversary cannot directly query the string x on S , since otherwise a valid tag can be easily obtained by that adversary.

  4. List of hash functions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_hash_functions

    BSD checksum (Unix) 16 bits sum with circular rotation SYSV checksum (Unix) 16 bits sum with circular rotation sum8 8 bits sum Internet Checksum: 16 bits sum (ones' complement) sum24 24 bits sum sum32 32 bits sum fletcher-4: 4 bits sum fletcher-8: 8 bits sum fletcher-16: 16 bits sum fletcher-32: 32 bits sum Adler-32: 32 bits sum xor8: 8 bits ...

  5. Checksum - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checksum

    The content of such spam may often vary in its details, which would render normal checksumming ineffective. By contrast, a "fuzzy checksum" reduces the body text to its characteristic minimum, then generates a checksum in the usual manner. This greatly increases the chances of slightly different spam emails producing the same checksum.

  6. Length extension attack - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Length_extension_attack

    In cryptography and computer security, a length extension attack is a type of attack where an attacker can use Hash(message 1) and the length of message 1 to calculate Hash(message 1 ‖ message 2) for an attacker-controlled message 2, without needing to know the content of message 1.

  7. Cryptographic hash function - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_hash_function

    Checksum algorithms, such as CRC32 and other cyclic redundancy checks, are designed to meet much weaker requirements and are generally unsuitable as cryptographic hash functions. For example, a CRC was used for message integrity in the WEP encryption standard, but an attack was readily discovered, which exploited the linearity of the checksum.

  8. Key checksum value - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_checksum_value

    In cryptography, a Key Checksum Value (KCV) is the checksum of a cryptographic key. [1] It is used to validate the integrity of the key or compare keys without knowing their actual values. The KCV is computed by encrypting a block of bytes, each with value '00' or '01', with the cryptographic key and retaining the first 6 hexadecimal characters ...

  9. Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salted_Challenge_Response...

    ClientKey = HMAC(SaltedPassword, 'Client Key') ServerKey = HMAC(SaltedPassword, 'Server Key') ClientProof = p = ClientKey XOR HMAC(H(ClientKey), Auth) ServerSignature = v = HMAC(ServerKey, Auth) where the XOR operation is applied to byte strings of the same length, H(ClientKey) is a normal hash of ClientKey. 'Client Key' and 'Server Key' are ...