Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
He also argued a number of cases in state courts and three times before the Supreme Court of the United States. [4] His views are sometimes considered conservative, though he was a self-described Democrat. [5] [6] Monaghan was named a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1988. [7] Monaghan died on January 1, 2025, at the age ...
Mayo v. Prometheus, 566 U.S. 66 (2012), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that unanimously held that claims directed to a method of giving a drug to a patient, measuring metabolites of that drug, and with a known threshold for efficacy in mind, deciding whether to increase or decrease the dosage of the drug, were not patent-eligible subject matter.
Mayo Foundation v. United States, 562 U.S. 44 (2011), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld a Treasury Department regulation on the grounds that the courts should defer to government agencies in tax cases in absence of an unreasonable decision on the part of the agency.
Thomas Monaghan, the 75-year-old founder of Domino's Pizza and a devout Catholic, is suing three government agencies and their directors, alleging that the birth control provision in the ...
The uniform act provides that a state supreme court may answer questions of law certified to it by the United States Supreme Court, a court of appeals of the United States, a United States district court, or the highest appellate or intermediate appellate court of any other state. The certifying court must certify the question in writing, and ...
A hearing for a preliminary injunction to block the executive order was held February 6, 2025. [6] [7] The same day Judge Coughenour issued a preliminary injunction enjoining the enforcement of the executive order. The US Justice Department filed a notice it will appeal. The appeal will shift the matter to the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals. [8]
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc. v. Sequenom, Inc., 788 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2015), [1] is a controversial decision of the US Federal Circuit in which the court applied the Mayo v. . Prometheus test [2] to invalidate on the basis of subject matter eligibility a patent said to "solve ... a very practical problem accessing fetal DNA without creating a major health risk for the unborn chil
United States ex rel. Gerald Mayo v. Satan and His Staff was a 1971 case filed before the United States district court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in which Gerald Mayo alleged that "Satan has on numerous occasions caused plaintiff misery and unwarranted threats, against the will of plaintiff, that Satan has placed deliberate obstacles in his path and has caused plaintiff's ...