Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Redmond-Bate v Director of Public Prosecutions [1999] EWHC Admin 733, was a case heard before the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court regarding freedom of speech and breach of the peace.
Bates v Bulman [1973] 3 All ER 170 [33] – the Divisional Court held that the accused who grabbed an unopened clasp knife with the immediate intention of using it as an offensive weapon did not commit an offence. This was held to be because of the purpose of the Prevention of Crime Act 1953, which was designed "to cover the situation where an ...
L. Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District; List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 506; List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 507
This is a list of miscarriage of justice cases.This list includes cases where a convicted individual was later cleared of the crime and either has received an official exoneration, or a consensus exists that the individual was unjustly punished or where a conviction has been quashed and no retrial has taken place, so that the accused is legally assumed innocent.
Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the right of lawyers to advertise their services. [1] In holding that lawyer advertising was commercial speech entitled to protection under the First Amendment (incorporated against the States through the Fourteenth Amendment), the Court upset the tradition against advertising ...
Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11; [2012] 13 ILRM 153; [2012] 2 IR 266 [1] is an Irish Supreme Court case which considered whether section 29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939 was unconstitutional.
Mitchell v DPP; Court: Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: Full case name: Andy Mitchell and 18 Others, Appellants v The Director of Public Prosecutions and The Attorney General, Respondents : Decided: 25 July 1985: Citations [1985] UKPC 27, 32 WIR 241: Case history; Prior action: Court of Appeal of Grenada: Case opinions; Lord Diplock ...
Dunne v Director of Public Prosecutions, [2002] 2 IR 305; [2002] IESC 27; [2002] 2 ILRM 241, is a reported Irish Supreme Court case in which the Court held that fair procedure imposes a duty on the prosecution to seek out and preserve all evidence that has a bearing or a potential bearing on the issue of guilt or innocence.