When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of Terry stop case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Terry_stop_case_law

    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) — stop and frisk for weapons OK for officer safety; Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40 (1968) — companion case to Terry. Peters v. New York (1968) — companion case to Terry contained in Sibron

  3. Terry stop - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_stop

    The Terry stop operates under the assumption that although stop-and-frisk is an intrusion, the potential harm from weapons outweighs it. [16] The cases following Terry expanded the power of the police. While the original case was concerned with armed violence and firsthand observation by officers, Adams v.

  4. Terry v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_v._Ohio

    Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the court ruled that it is constitutional for American police to "stop and frisk" a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime.

  5. Trump’s pledge to reinstate ‘stop and frisk’ puts some of the ...

    www.aol.com/news/trump-courts-black-men-pledges...

    With stop and frisk, ... Black people were stopped in 55% of such cases, Latinos in 32% and whites in 10%. In addition, the murder rate fell to record lows after stop and frisk was banned, ...

  6. Stop-and-frisk in New York City - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop-and-frisk_in_New_York...

    Stop-and-frisk was an issue in the 2013 mayoral election. The race to succeed Bloomberg was won by Democratic Party candidate Bill de Blasio, who had pledged to reform the stop-and-frisk program, called for new leadership at the NYPD, an inspector general, and a strong racial profiling bill. [42]

  7. Florida v. J. L. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_v._J._L.

    Florida v. J. L., 529 U.S. 266 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that a police officer may not legally stop and frisk someone based solely on an anonymous tip that describes a person's location and appearance, but does not furnish information as to any illegal conduct.

  8. Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiibel_v._Sixth_Judicial...

    Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 542 U.S. 177 (2004), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a statute requiring suspects to disclose their names during a valid Terry stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment if the statute first requires reasonable suspicion of criminal involvement, and does not violate the Fifth Amendment if there is no ...

  9. Donald Trump praises 'stop-and-frisk' police tactic

    www.aol.com/article/news/2016/09/21/donald-trump...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us