Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Norm type, specified as 2 (default), a positive real scalar, Inf, or -Inf.The valid values of p and what they return depend on whether the first input to norm is a matrix or vector, as shown in the table.
9. I have a brief question regarding the infinity matrix norm. The subordinate matrix infinity norm is defined as: ‖A‖∞ = max 1 ≤ i ≤ n n ∑ j = 1 | aij |. This is derived from the general definition of a subordinate matrix norm which is defined as: ‖A‖ = max {‖Ax‖ ‖x‖: x ∈ Kn, x ≠ 0}. I wanted to try this out in an ...
I know that the p -norm for a matrix is: ‖A‖ = max x ≠ 0 ‖Ax‖p ‖x‖p. but I don't know what this really means. So how would I compute the 2 -norm, 3 -norm, etc for the matrix. A = [2 1 1 2] UPDATE Apparently, the above matrix is too easy :) Let's try something harder. A = [2 1 4 3 0 − 1 1 1 2] Thanks, linear-algebra.
5. I need to prove the ∞ -norm of a matrix, which is here. ‖A‖∞ = max x ≠ 0 {max 1 ≤ i ≤ n | (Ax)i | max 1 ≤ i ≤ n | xi |}. I can't find the the proof anywhere and would appreciate if someone could explain every step of the proof. Thank you! matrices. solution-verification. proof-explanation.
3. Considering the Frobenius norm ∥.∥F ‖. ‖ F, how can we prove that it's submultiplicative? N.b: I noticed there is a user who asked a similar question but proof looked like directing away from the question. I hope anyone can help me. numerical-methods.
The operator norm is a matrix/operator norm associated with a vector norm. It is defined as. | | A | | OP = supx ≠ 0 Ax n x. and different for each vector norm. In case of the Euclidian norm | x | 2 the operator norm is equivalent to the 2-matrix norm (the maximum singular value, as you already stated).
So in your case it seems that A ∈ Rm × n. Then, it holds by the definition of the operator norm. ‖A‖2 = ‖A‖ℓ2 (Rn) → ℓ2 (Rm) = sup x ∈ Rn‖Ax‖ℓ2 (Rm) ‖x‖ℓ2 (Rn) By taking the square and expanding the norm to the ℓ2 -scalar product, one arrives at the Rayleigh quotient of ATA.
The original question was asking about a matrix H and a matrix A, so presumably we are talking about the operator norm. The selected answer doesn't parse with the definitions of A and H stated by the OP -- if A is a matrix or more generally an operator, (A,A) is not defined (unless you have actually defined an inner product on the space of ...
Proof of infinity matrix norm. The matrix ∞ -norm for A ∈ Rm × n is defined as. ‖ A‖∞ = max 1 ≤ i ≤ n‖ ai‖1. where ai is the i th) row in matrix A. Show that. ‖ A‖∞ = max {‖ Ax‖∞: x∞ ≤ 1} = max {‖ Ax‖∞: x∞ = 1} I know that this is a property of subordinate matrix norms but I'm not sure how to go about ...
Stack Exchange Network. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.