When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of programming languages (strings) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    Visual Basic and Visual Basic .NET can also use the "+" sign but at the risk of ambiguity if a string representing a number and a number are together. Microsoft Excel allows both "&" and the function "=CONCATENATE(X,Y)". Rust has the concat! macro and the format! macro, of which the latter is the most prevalent throughout the documentation and ...

  3. Comparison of programming languages (string functions)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    For function that manipulate strings, modern object-oriented languages, like C# and Java have immutable strings and return a copy (in newly allocated dynamic memory), while others, like C manipulate the original string unless the programmer copies data to a new string. See for example Concatenation below.

  4. Comparison of server-side web frameworks - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_server-side...

    Comparison of Java and .NET platforms ALGOL 58's influence on ALGOL 60; ALGOL 60: Comparisons with other languages; Comparison of ALGOL 68 and C++; ALGOL 68: Comparisons with other languages; Compatibility of C and C++; Comparison of Pascal and Borland Delphi; Comparison of Object Pascal and C; Comparison of Pascal and C; Comparison of Java and C++

  5. Comparison of Java and C++ - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Java_and_C++

    C++ (pre-C++11) does not specify whether or not these operators truncate to zero or "truncate to -infinity". -3/2 will always be -1 in Java and C++11, but a C++03 compiler may return either -1 or -2, depending on the platform. C99 defines division in the same fashion as Java and C++11.

  6. String literal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_literal

    Beyond syntactic requirements of C/C++, implicit concatenation is a form of syntactic sugar, making it simpler to split string literals across several lines, avoiding the need for line continuation (via backslashes) and allowing one to add comments to parts of strings. For example, in Python, one can comment a regular expression in this way: [21]

  7. Java performance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_performance

    Results for microbenchmarks between Java and C++ highly depend on which operations are compared. For example, when comparing with Java 5.0: 32- and 64-bit arithmetic operations, [48] [49] file input/output, [50] and exception handling [51] have a similar performance to comparable C++ programs; Operations on arrays [52] have better performance in C.

  8. Comparison of programming languages - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    Comparison of ALGOL 68 and C++; ALGOL 68: Comparisons with other languages; Compatibility of C and C++; Comparison of Pascal and Borland Delphi; Comparison of Object Pascal and C; Comparison of Pascal and C; Comparison of Java and C++; Comparison of C# and Java; Comparison of C# and Visual Basic .NET; Comparison of Visual Basic and Visual Basic ...

  9. Comparison of programming languages (associative array)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    As in Perl 5, Perl 6 default hashes are flat: keys are strings and values are scalars. One can define a hash to not coerce all keys to strings automatically: these are referred to as "object hashes", because the keys of such hashes remain the original object rather than a stringification thereof.