When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: shelby county v holder 5 4 case

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Shelby County v. Holder - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelby_County_v._Holder

    Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), is a landmark decision [1] of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and subsection (b) of Section 4 ...

  3. John Lewis Voting Rights Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lewis_Voting_Rights_Act

    On June 25, 2013, the United States Supreme Court struck down section 4(b) by a 54 decision in the case of Shelby County v. Holder. The court found Section 4(b) of the VRA unconstitutional because it was outdated. Invalidating section 4(b) left the federal pre-clearance requirement in Section 5 without a formula to determine what ...

  4. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 570

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 570 of the United States Reports: Case name ... Shelby County v. Holder: 570 U.S. 529: June 25 ...

  5. Analysis: John Roberts remains confounded by Donald Trump as ...

    www.aol.com/analysis-john-roberts-remains...

    Roberts’ pattern of favoring GOP interests has been entrenched by his decisions in such cases as the 2013 Shelby County v. Holder (gutting part of the Voting Rights Act) and the 2019 Rucho v.

  6. Timeline of voting rights in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_voting_rights...

    Supreme Court ruled in the 54 Shelby County v. Holder decision that Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional. Section 4(b) stated that if states or local governments want to change their voting laws, they must appeal to the Attorney General. [66] Delaware waives the five-year waiting period for voters with a felony ...

  7. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brnovich_v._Democratic...

    Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case related to voting rights established by the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), and specifically the applicability of Section 2's general provision barring discrimination against minorities in state and local election laws in the wake of the 2013 Supreme Court decision Shelby County v.

  8. State Voting Rights Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Voting_Rights_Act

    [15] [16] Preclearance was the key feature of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 before it was rendered inoperable by the Supreme Court in Shelby County v. Holder. Under the VRA, preclearance required jurisdictions with a history of racial discrimination in voting to receive approval from the federal government before implementing any changes to ...

  9. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  1. Ad

    related to: shelby county v holder 5 4 case