When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Jackson v. Indiana - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson_v._Indiana

    Jackson v. Indiana , 406 U.S. 715 (1972), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that determined a U.S. state violated due process by involuntarily committing a criminal defendant for an indefinite period of time solely on the basis of his permanent incompetency to stand trial on the charges filed against him.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving mental health

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Executing persons with mental retardation is not a violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Overturned in Atkins v. Virginia (2002)) 8th 1993 Godinez v. Moran: Competency to stand trial includes the abilities to plead guilty and to waive the right to counsel 1st 2002 Atkins v. Virginia

  4. Defending the Guilty - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defending_the_Guilty

    Defending the Guilty is a British television sitcom, starring Will Sharpe and Katherine Parkinson as London barristers. The programme was broadcast in the United Kingdom from 19 September 2018 on BBC Two. A second series was commissioned, but it was cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

  5. United States federal laws governing defendants with mental ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_laws...

    United States federal laws governing offenders with mental diseases or defects (18 U.S.C. §§ 4241–4248) provide for the evaluation and handling of defendants who are suspected of having mental diseases or defects.

  6. Justice Jackson would consider an 'enforceable' Supreme ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/justice-ketanji-brown-jackson...

    Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said she is open to proposals to implement an "enforceable code" of ethics for justices and lamented the court's presidential immunity decision in an ...

  7. Insanity defense - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity_defense

    In the United States, a psychiatrist, psychologist or other mental health professional is often consulted as an expert witness in insanity cases, but the ultimate legal judgment of the defendant's sanity is determined by a jury, not by a mental health professional. In other words, mental health professionals provide testimony and professional ...

  8. Justice Jackson signals support for Supreme Court code of ...

    www.aol.com/justice-jackson-signals-support...

    Jackson is the latest justice to indicate an openness to an enforceable code of ethics at a time when the Supreme Court is facing heavy scrutiny — and near record low approval ratings ...

  9. Jones v. United States (1983) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jones_v._United_States_(1983)

    Jones v. United States, 463 U.S. 354 (1983), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court, for the first time, addressed whether the due process requirement of the Fourteenth Amendment allows defendants, who were found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) of a misdemeanor crime, to be involuntarily confined to a mental institution until such times as they are no longer a danger ...