Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The logical square, also called square of opposition or square of Apuleius, has its origin in the four marked sentences to be employed in syllogistic reasoning: "Every man is bad," the universal affirmative - The negation of the universal affirmative "Not every man is bad" (or "Some men are not bad") - "Some men are bad," the particular ...
A proposition may be universal or particular, and it may be affirmative or negative. Traditionally, the four kinds of propositions are: A-type: Universal and affirmative ("All philosophers are mortal") E-type: Universal and negative ("All philosophers are not mortal") I-type: Particular and affirmative ("Some philosophers are mortal")
In traditional logic, obversion is a "type of immediate inference in which from a given proposition another proposition is inferred whose subject is the same as the original subject, whose predicate is the contradictory of the original predicate, and whose quality is affirmative if the original proposition's quality was negative and vice versa". [1]
A variable in a formula that is not bound by a quantifier and does not have a specific value assigned to it within the context of the formula. Frege's theorem A result in logic and mathematics demonstrating that arithmetic can be derived from logic through the introduction of the concept of a successor and the use of second-order quantification.
The logical square, also called square of opposition or square of Apuleius has its origin in the four marked sentences to be employed in syllogistic reasoning: Every man is white, the universal affirmative and its negation Not every man is white (or Some men are not white), the particular negative on the one hand, Some men are white, the particular affirmative and its negation No man is white ...
Illicit treatment of the minor term: Same as above, but for the minor term (S – meaning the proposition is universal) and minor premise (where S is either a particular subject or an affirmative predicate). Exclusive premises: Both premises are negative, meaning no link is established between the major and minor terms.
Dictum de omni (sometimes misinterpreted as universal instantiation) [2] is the principle that whatever is universally affirmed of a kind is affirmable as well for any subkind of that kind. Example: (1) Dogs are mammals. (2) Mammals have livers. Therefore (3) dogs have livers. Premise (1) states that "dog" is a subkind of the kind "mammal".
A: The Universal Affirmative Example: "All metals are elements." E: The Universal Negative Example: "No metals are compound substances." I: The Particular Affirmative Example: "Some metals are brittle." O: The Particular Negative Example: "Some metals are not brittle." [8] Venn (1834–1923) comments on the remarkable prevalence of the Euler ...