Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Subgraph isomorphism is a generalization of the graph isomorphism problem, which asks whether G is isomorphic to H: the answer to the graph isomorphism problem is true if and only if G and H both have the same numbers of vertices and edges and the subgraph isomorphism problem for G and H is true. However the complexity-theoretic status of graph ...
This two-graph is a regular two-graph since each pair of distinct vertices appears together in exactly two triples. Given a simple graph G = (V,E), the set of triples of the vertex set V whose induced subgraph has an odd number of edges forms a two-graph on the set V. Every two-graph can be represented in this way. [1]
Graphlets in mathematics are induced subgraph isomorphism classes in a graph, [1] [2] i.e. two graphlet occurrences are isomorphic, whereas two graphlets are non-isomorphic. . Graphlets differ from network motifs in a statistical sense, network motifs are defined as over- or under-represented graphlets with respect to some random graph null m
A set of graphs isomorphic to each other is called an isomorphism class of graphs. The question of whether graph isomorphism can be determined in polynomial time is a major unsolved problem in computer science, known as the graph isomorphism problem. [1] [2] The two graphs shown below are isomorphic, despite their different looking drawings.
The graph isomorphism problem is the computational problem of determining whether two finite graphs are isomorphic. [1]The problem is not known to be solvable in polynomial time nor to be NP-complete, and therefore may be in the computational complexity class NP-intermediate.
A canonical form is a labeled graph Canon(G) that is isomorphic to G, such that every graph that is isomorphic to G has the same canonical form as G. Thus, from a solution to the graph canonization problem, one could also solve the problem of graph isomorphism: to test whether two graphs G and H are isomorphic, compute their canonical forms ...
Two graphs G and H are homomorphically equivalent if G → H and H → G. [4] The maps are not necessarily surjective nor injective. For instance, the complete bipartite graphs K 2,2 and K 3,3 are homomorphically equivalent: each map can be defined as taking the left (resp. right) half of the domain graph and mapping to just one vertex in the left (resp. right) half of the image graph.
In general, a subdivision of a graph G (sometimes known as an expansion [2]) is a graph resulting from the subdivision of edges in G. The subdivision of some edge e with endpoints {u,v } yields a graph containing one new vertex w, and with an edge set replacing e by two new edges, {u,w } and {w,v }. For directed edges, this operation shall ...