Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A man is suing Brita, alleging its filters are "not nearly as effective" in removing "common hazardous contaminants from drinking water" like PFAS (or "forever chemicals") as it claims.
Under a settlement in one major class action PFAS case, approved this spring by U.S. Judge Richard Gergel of Charleston, 3M expects to pay about $10.3 billion over 13 years to more than 11,000 ...
The products marketed as safe were made with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) chemical products, known as forever chemicals. They include brand names Teflon, Stainmaster and Scotchgard ...
The DoD has "used foam containing" PFAS chemicals "in exercises at bases across the country". The DoD, therefore, "risks the biggest liabilities" in relation to the use of PFAS chemicals according to Politico. [71] March 2018 The PFAS Expert Health Panel on PFAS submitted their commissioned report to the Australian government. [89]
False advertising is the act of publishing, transmitting, distributing, or otherwise publicly circulating an advertisement containing a false claim, or statement, made intentionally (or recklessly) to promote the sale of property, goods, or services. [3]
A class-action lawsuit has accused Brita, the popular water filter company, of false advertising. Skip to main content. Sign in. Mail. 24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800 ...
In the first off-label promotion case ever litigated in a whistleblower suit under the False Claims Act, the settlement was announced after eight years of litigation in May 2004. Warner-Lambert agreed to pay $430 million to resolve all civil and criminal liability, with $24.64 million going to Franklin for his participation in the lawsuit. [ 2 ]
"Forever" chemicals are proving to be extremely costly to the companies that produced them. 3M and Dupont have agreed to pay more than $15 billion to settle claims that PFAS chemicals, or per- and ...