Ad
related to: richard dawkins intelligent design theory
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Dawkins has opposed the inclusion of intelligent design in science education, describing it as "not a scientific argument at all, but a religious one". [139] He has been referred to in the media as "Darwin's Rottweiler ", [ 140 ] [ 141 ] a reference to English biologist T. H. Huxley , who was known as "Darwin's Bulldog " for his advocacy of ...
Intelligent design (ID) is a ... design proponents" as well as the phrase "design theory", defining the term intelligent design in a glossary and ... Richard Dawkins, ...
The defense's expert witness John Haught noted that both intelligent design and the watchmaker analogy are "reformulations" of the same theological argument. [23] On day 21 of the trial, Mr. Harvey walked Dr. Minnich through a modernized version of Paley's argument, substituting a cell phone for the watch. [ 24 ]
The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design is a 1986 book by Richard Dawkins, in which the author presents an explanation of, and argument for, the theory of evolution by means of natural selection. He also presents arguments to refute certain criticisms made on his first book, The Selfish Gene.
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed is a 2008 American propaganda film directed by Nathan Frankowski and starring Ben Stein. [3] [4] It is presented as a documentary promoting the conspiracy theory that academia oppresses and excludes people who believe in intelligent design.
Intelligent Design as a Theory of Information, by William A. Dembski; Information and the Argument from Design, by Peter Godfrey-Smith; How Not to Detect Design, by Branden Fitelson, Christopher Stephens & Elliott Sober; The 'Information Challenge', by Richard Dawkins; Intelligent Design Theorists Turn the Tables Who's Got the Magic?, by ...
Richard Dawkins is harshly critical of intelligent design in his book The God Delusion. In this book, he contends that an appeal to intelligent design can provide no explanation for biology because it not only begs the question of the designer's own origin but raises additional questions: an intelligent designer must itself be far more complex ...
Irreducible complexity (IC) is the argument that certain biological systems with multiple interacting parts would not function if one of the parts were removed, so supposedly could not have evolved by successive small modifications from earlier less complex systems through natural selection, which would need all intermediate precursor systems to have been fully functional. [1]