Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The Uniform Vehicle Code (UVC) is a model act by the National Committee on Uniform Traffic Laws and Ordinances, a private non-profit organization. Most of the members are state governments, in addition to some related organizations. The extent to which the code is used varies by each state, territory, and Native American tribe. It was last ...
Title 49 of the United States Code is a positive law title of the United States Code with the heading "Transportation." The title was enacted into positive law by Pub. L. 95–473 , § 1, October 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 1337 ; Pub. L. 97–449 , § 1, January 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2413 ; and Pub. L. 103–272 , July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 745 (subtitles II ...
Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. , 463 U.S. 29 (1983), commonly known in U.S. administrative law as State Farm , is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning regulations requiring passive restraints in cars.
Consumers may be protected by different levels of coverage depending on which insurance policy they purchase. Coverage is sometimes seen as 20/40/15 or 100/300/100. The first two numbers seen are for medical coverage. In the 100/300 example, the policy will pay $100,000 per person up to $300,000 total for all people.
The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.
Canada has a system of analogous rules called the Canada Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (CMVSS), which overlap substantially but not completely in content and structure with the FMVSS. The FMVSS/CMVSS requirements differ significantly from the international UN requirements, so private import of foreign vehicles not originally manufactured to ...
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050 (1916) Judge Benjamin N. Cardozo which removed the requirement of privity of contract for duty in negligence actions. Martin v. Herzog, 228 N Y. 164, 126 N.E. 814 (1920) Tedla v. Ellman, 280 N.Y. 124, 19 N.E.2d 987, (1939) [3] on negligence per se, or the violation of a duty under a statute
Early federal and state civil procedure in the United States was rather ad hoc and was based on traditional common law procedure but with much local variety. There were varying rules that governed different types of civil cases such as "actions" at law or "suits" in equity or in admiralty; these differences grew from the history of "law" and "equity" as separate court systems in English law.