When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Millennium Prize Problems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Prize_Problems

    The real part of every nontrivial zero of the Riemann zeta function is 1/2. The Riemann hypothesis is that all nontrivial zeros of the analytical continuation of the Riemann zeta function have a real part of ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠. A proof or disproof of this would have far-reaching implications in number theory, especially for the distribution of prime ...

  3. Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem for specific exponents

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_Fermat's_Last...

    Integers can be divided into even and odd, those that are evenly divisible by two and those that are not. The even integers are ...−4, −2, 0, 2, 4,... whereas the odd integers are ...−3, −1, 1, 3,.... The property of whether an integer is even (or not) is known as its parity. If two numbers are both even or both odd, they have the same ...

  4. Proofs That Really Count - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proofs_That_Really_Count

    Proofs That Really Count: the Art of Combinatorial Proof is an undergraduate-level mathematics book on combinatorial proofs of mathematical identies.That is, it concerns equations between two integer-valued formulas, shown to be equal either by showing that both sides of the equation count the same type of mathematical objects, or by finding a one-to-one correspondence between the different ...

  5. Proofs of trigonometric identities - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proofs_of_trigonometric...

    For the sine function, we can handle other values. If θ > π /2, then θ > 1. But sin θ ≤ 1 (because of the Pythagorean identity), so sin θ < θ. So we have ⁡ < <. For negative values of θ we have, by the symmetry of the sine function

  6. Proofs involving the addition of natural numbers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proofs_involving_the...

    Next we will prove the base case b = 1, that 1 commutes with everything, i.e. for all natural numbers a, we have a + 1 = 1 + a. We will prove this by induction on a (an induction proof within an induction proof). We have proved that 0 commutes with everything, so in particular, 0 commutes with 1: for a = 0, we have 0 + 1 = 1 + 0

  7. Triviality (mathematics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triviality_(mathematics)

    Trivial may also refer to any easy case of a proof, which for the sake of completeness cannot be ignored. For instance, proofs by mathematical induction have two parts: the "base case" which shows that the theorem is true for a particular initial value (such as n = 0 or n = 1), and the inductive step which shows that if the theorem is true for a certain value of n, then it is also true for the ...

  8. Proof of Bertrand's postulate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_Bertrand's_postulate

    The following elementary proof was published by Paul Erdős in 1932, as one of his earliest mathematical publications. [3] The basic idea is to show that the central binomial coefficients must have a prime factor within the interval ( n , 2 n ) {\displaystyle (n,2n)} in order to be large enough.

  9. Fundamental theorem of arithmetic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of...

    999 = 3 3 ×37, 1000 = 2 3 ×5 3, 1001 = 7×11×13. Factors p 0 = 1 may be inserted without changing the value of n (for example, 1000 = 2 3 ×3 0 ×5 3). In fact, any positive integer can be uniquely represented as an infinite product taken over all the positive prime numbers, as